Chapter 18 The Past Women #2

Mara looked at me. "The drafts may contain internal commentary."

"Then she should see what the system said about her when she was not in the room."

Isla's pen paused.

I did not look at her for approval. The decision belonged to the woman requesting the file. Still, I felt Isla register the difference between transparency offered as proof and transparency surrendered because another person had the right to it.

Mara read the final message twice.

"We need to know what that means," she said.

"We need to offer her a channel to tell us if she chooses," Isla replied. "We do not pursue the phrase as a threat assessment."

"It could indicate undisclosed conduct."

"Then independent counsel can explain the options. Carrington does not knock on her door because a sentence made the board nervous."

Mara looked at me.

A week earlier, I might have ordered the contact and called it responsible governance.

"Use the independent channel," I said. "No follow-up if she declines."

Isla returned to her notes.

The distance between us remained.

I had canceled the public schedule. I had admitted it should never have existed. Neither act made the system disappear, and neither restored the privacy of the night she had chosen.

Accountability was proving inconveniently resistant to accumulation. Correct decisions did not stack into entitlement.

At noon, June's full interview published.

We watched it in separate rooms.

I took the unfinished owner's office on the fourth floor. The room contained a desk, a temporary chair, and windows covered in protective film. Paris appeared through them as a blurred gray suggestion.

June spoke for thirty-eight minutes.

She described our first dinner after a film screening.

The way I remembered that she hated lilies and arranged for every suite on her production floor to use different flowers.

The three weeks we spent in Los Angeles while she edited.

A night in Montreal when we ate vending-machine crackers on a hotel stair because a power failure trapped the kitchen staff between service floors.

The memories were not accusations.

That made the ending worse.

"Damon was attentive," she said. "He was not cruel while the arrangement was active. He made me feel selected. Then the term ended, and the selection became administrative history."

The interviewer asked whether she had loved me.

June considered the question.

"Not in the way people want for a headline. I cared enough to want the ending to happen between us instead of around me."

I paused the video.

My own reflection hovered over her frozen face.

The agreements had allowed either person to leave at any time. I had believed that made every remaining day an active choice.

I had never considered that an automatic ending could erase the choice to say goodbye.

A knock sounded against the open door.

Isla stood outside.

"May I come in?" she asked.

The question belonged to the room, not the engagement.

"Yes."

She entered and took the temporary chair across from the desk.

"I watched it," she said.

"So did I."

"All of it?"

"Twice."

Her eyes moved to the screen. "What do you think she wanted from publishing?"

"To be known as more than the woman who waited in the lobby."

"That may be part of it."

"You disagree."

"I think she wanted control of the ending you left her. Selling the story means she chose the time, the room, the questions, and the last line."

I looked at June's image.

"And money."

"Yes. She is allowed to want money."

"Mara would appreciate the inconsistency in your commercial ethics."

"Mara understands that being paid does not make a woman's account false. She simply likes every true thing accompanied by a waiver."

Despite the day, I smiled.

Isla did not.

"Do not use humor to leave the room," she said.

The smile disappeared.

"All right."

She folded her hands in her lap.

"June's counsel contacted Daniel," she said. "She is willing to speak privately tomorrow. She wants you present."

The request struck with more force than the publication.

"What does she want?"

"She did not say. Her conditions are no recording, no Carrington counsel in the room, and no request that she retract or soften the interview."

"Agreed."

"She wants me there as the independent adviser."

"Do you want to be there?"

"Professionally, yes. Personally, I am not sure."

The answer contained a boundary, not a refusal.

"You do not need to make my apology safe," I said.

"I know."

"If your presence would make June feel observed by the woman currently attached to my reputation, I will ask her counsel whether she prefers someone else."

"She requested me by name."

I leaned back.

"Then I will not question her choice because it unsettles me."

"Good."

The word was not warm.

It was still from her.

My phone vibrated.

Adrian's message carried an image of reporters gathering outside the main entrance. Another former partner had posted the holding statement with one sentence.

He is finally describing the machine instead of asking us to prove we understood it.

Margot Sloane.

I read the sentence twice.

Isla watched my face. "What is it?"

I handed her the phone.

"She has also asked to speak with you," Isla said after reading. "Privately. After June."

"Did she request you too?"

"Yes."

"That seems like a poor reward for accepting dinner."

The joke formed by habit. I stopped before giving it voice.

Isla noticed the pause.

"What were you going to say?"

"Something that would make tomorrow sound easier than it will be."

"Why did you stop?"

"Because easy is what the contracts promised me."

For the first time since morning, her face softened.

Only slightly.

Enough to hurt.

We returned to the lender call at two. Reporters shouted June's name when I crossed the lobby. I did not use the service corridor. I did not stop to perform remorse either.

At the podium outside the meeting room, Adrian asked whether I would take one question.

The first reporter wanted to know whether June had breached her agreement.

"I will not use confidentiality to prevent her from describing how I treated her," I said.

The second asked whether she had been paid for the interview.

"Yes. I also paid her under the agreement. Neither payment makes her account untrue."

The third asked whether Isla had written my statement.

I saw her at the back of the room, still in the red sweater I had taken off her hours earlier.

"Ms. Morgan made one sentence more accurate," I said. "The decisions described in it are mine."

"Are you in love with her?"

The room surged toward the question.

A week earlier, I would have smiled, redirected, and given the audience enough pleasure to forgive the refusal.

I looked at Isla.

Her expression did not tell me which answer would help the opening.

That was the point.

"That question belongs to her and me before it belongs to you," I said.

Then I left the podium.

No headline could make the answer less true because I had not given it one.

The statement did not save the afternoon. It did not stop the interview from spreading or persuade every lender that the opening remained safe.

It did something smaller.

It left June's story intact without turning her into my enemy.

For the first time, a woman described the worst version of me in public, and I did not use my power to make her pay for being believed.

The restraint did not feel noble.

It felt late.

If ads affect your reading experience, click here to remove ads on this page.