Chapter 13

Angel muted the volume on the car’s sound system, silencing Michael McDonald’s voice. I remembered a music critic once proposing an alternative reality in which Lee Harvey Oswald shot Michael McDonald instead of John F. Kennedy, causing yacht rock never to happen.

I wished Angel had not felt the need to turn off the music.

I wished he had not spoken of Jennifer, and warnings, and recurring existences.

I wished the conversation, however overdue, had never begun.

Angel tugged at a frayed thread on the end of his sleeve.

His sleeves were always tattered, torn, or about to be torn; like a life, like a heart.

It made him appear childlike, lending him an innocence that was truer to his nature than any other aspect.

At times like these, I felt a love for him as profound as any for my dead wife; for Sharon Macy or Rachel Wolfe; even for my children.

What lay behind it, I could not have explained, being inexpressible in words, but that did not diminish its reality or the intensity of my affection for this man and his companion.

It was, perhaps, an aspect of the male psyche that some women did not understand: to say nothing is not the same as having nothing to say, and expressions of intimacy may be wordless yet all the deeper for it.

A reluctance, even an inability, to articulate one’s feelings, or their assertion in a different manner from the female, should not be confused with absence.

In his youth, the philosopher and essayist Michel de Montaigne had a deep friendship with the writer étienne de La Boétie, but after four years étienne died, just thirty-two, and Montaigne mourned him for the rest of his life.

Great writer though he was, Montaigne could never properly voice his love for étienne, nor why he was driven to grieve for him, the magnitude of his pain increasing, not abating, as the years went by.

Ultimately, Montaigne could only settle on: “Because it was he, because it was me.” Whether there was a sexual component to their relationship remains unclear, but there was desire, if only for the company of the beloved.

They needed to be with each other, and what is love, but a need that gives at least as much as it takes?

I needed Angel and Louis in my life, in a way that was different from Angel’s need for Louis, and Louis’s for Angel, while retaining the same complexion.

Without them, my life would have been poorer, emptier.

More than that, I’m not sure I could have survived the deaths of Susan and Jennifer without Angel and Louis to fall back on.

They had entered my life just in time to save me.

But why, from the start, had I responded to them without reservation, these seeming strangers, and they to me?

I found an answer in an echo of Angel’s earlier words: Because we had known one another from before, because we had always known one another.

Montaigne, too, offered a response, for this is what he wrote of his relationship with étienne: “We sought each other before we met.” Had I been seeking Angel and Louis, unconsciously, unknown to myself, just as they had been seeking each other? If so, why?

Now Angel was speaking again—of Louis, and of lives formerly lived.

“It’s been happening more often these last few months,” he said, “or these last few years, but it’s only recently that I’ve started to understand what it might mean.

I used to think I was afraid of losing Louis, which caused me to—what’s the word, ‘catastrophize’?

Yes, catastrophize. So I was picturing scenarios that might never happen, imagining a life without him, as if I could prepare myself for the worst by exploring my responses to it before it became a reality.

But all the time, I was hoping I’d die before him, as I was afraid I would during the worst of the cancer treatment, when I wanted to die, I really did.

I knew it was selfish, but I preferred to leave Louis to cope with my loss rather than force me to live with his.

And then it came to me that it didn’t matter: I was convinced I would find him again, or he would find me.

It wouldn’t make the pain of parting any less, but it would make the years without him easier to bear. ”

He worried at his lower lip.

“Except,” he continued, “I feel—as sure as I’m with you here, in this car, on this road—that I never had that sense of a hidden past before now, only the pain, because the pain was the purpose.

And I think you were there too, just as you’ve always been there, but as a shadow, unformed. Then you stepped into the light.”

He studied me warily.

“Is this madness?” he asked. “Because if it is, it’s a madness I endure with Louis, and he’ll corroborate everything I’ve told you. He’s shared my thoughts and dreams, been visited by Jennifer, and reached the same conclusions. The question is: Do you also share this particular madness?”

I could not reply, not at first. When I did, it came as a release.

“Yes,” I said, “I share it all.”

If ads affect your reading experience, click here to remove ads on this page.