Chapter 10 #2

Rationale: Evidentiary integrity requires independent corroboration of corridor vector alignment at issuance and the timeline of communication disruption.

Continued withholding enables incomplete prosecutorial reconstruction and may conceal external override activity.

I accept personal and diplomatic consequences of release.

I read it twice, then a third time.

The words are clean.

They are also a declaration of war against silence.

I tap send.

The terminal chimes and the message vanishes into the channel, swallowed by monitored networks and diplomatic bureaucracy. For a moment, nothing happens, because bureaucracy does not react quickly unless it is afraid.

I sit back and exhale slowly, feeling the weight shift in my chest. Not lighter—never lighter—but different, like moving a blade from one hand to another.

A soft tone sounds from the terminal: an incoming message request.

My pulse jumps once, restrained but sharp.

The interface displays a familiar identifier.

Advocate Pellorin.

I accept.

His face appears in pale blue holo, the image flickering slightly because the custody network throttles anything human.

He looks tired, eyes shadowed, mouth tight. “What did you do?”

“Hello to you too,” I reply, and the faint colloquial edge in my voice surprises me; humor feels like contraband here.

Pellorin does not smile. “Rhyx.”

“I authorized the Coalition to release limited fragments of fleet communications,” I say.

His eyes widen slightly. “You— You understand what that implies.”

“I do.”

“You are escalating beyond negligence defense. You are pushing toward systemic inquiry.”

“Yes.”

Pellorin’s expression tightens with frustration and fear. “The League will interpret this as hostile. The Coalition hawks will interpret this as permission. You are—”

“—tired of watching other people pay for my silence,” I finish, my voice low.

Pellorin stares at me for a long moment. “Is this about Selene Ardent?”

“It is about the record,” I reply automatically, then pause, because automatic answers are often lies. “It is also about her. She is being crushed in real time. She is digging without protection. If I keep playing martyr while she gets destroyed, then what I called sacrifice becomes… pointless.”

Pellorin’s gaze flicks away briefly, then returns. “You’re worried about her.”

“I am worried about what happens when institutions learn they can punish truth-tellers into silence,” I answer, and the words sound grander than the room deserves, but they are true.

“If she breaks, they will call it proof. If she disappears, they will call it necessity. And the next person will learn the lesson.”

Pellorin exhales slowly. “And you think releasing comm fragments will help.”

“It will force the tribunal to confront the blackout timeline,” I say. “It will corroborate that I could not receive recalibration updates after 14:00. It will widen the seam. They can still try to patch it, but at least they will have to patch it in public.”

Pellorin’s jaw tightens. “You are gambling with the ceasefire.”

“I gambled with it when I chose silence,” I reply. “I just didn’t admit it.”

His eyes narrow. “You’re going to be painted as orchestrating this.”

“Let them paint,” I say, and my voice hardens. “I’ve been painted for years.”

Pellorin goes quiet, studying me, then nods once, reluctantly. “Alright. If you do this, we do it right. We control the scope. We release only what’s necessary, and we attach it to formal evidentiary submission so they can’t spin it as propaganda.”

“Good,” I say. “Do that.”

He hesitates. “Rhyx… once this begins, it won’t stop.”

“I know,” I reply, and the knowledge sits heavy but clean. “It should have started years ago.”

Pellorin’s expression softens for a fraction of a second, and in that fraction I see the man beneath the advocate, the one who has carried political nightmares for too long.

“Get some rest,” he says quietly, as if rest could be a shield.

“I’ll try,” I answer, though we both know trying is meaningless.

The holo fades.

I sit alone again, the custody room returning to its manufactured quiet.

The terminal’s glow is the only light that feels alive, and even it is filtered through restrictions and warnings.

Somewhere beyond these walls, Selene is still moving through tribunal corridors with her shoulders squared, carrying municipal telemetry like a concealed blade, refusing to be reduced to a headline.

Somewhere beyond, Drax is balancing on the razor edge between law and politics.

Somewhere beyond, senators are already drafting statements about “diplomatic urgency” and “public interest,” words that taste like smoke.

And somewhere in the Coalition’s sealed archives, a clerk or an officer or a diplomat will soon open a classified drawer and pull out fragments of my fleet’s communications, fragments I once allowed to remain hidden in the name of peace.

I lie back on the narrow platform, not to sleep—sleep is too indulgent—but to stare at the ceiling panel and listen to the filtered air hum through vents.

My mind returns again to the corridor line over Kirell, to the twelve-minute seam, to the way the projections looked in the tribunal chamber, polished into simplicity for the public to consume.

I whisper into the sterile air, not a prayer, not quite a vow, but something close.

“Alright,” I say. “No more passive acceptance.”

The words do not echo, because custody rooms are designed to swallow sound, but I feel them settle anyway, deep in the chest where old decisions live, and I know that by morning—maybe sooner—the case will no longer be only about whether I was negligent.

It will be about who had the authority to move civilians like pieces on a board, and who has spent years pretending the board was fair.

If ads affect your reading experience, click here to remove ads on this page.