Chapter 34

Evie

Two weeks later

Two weeks is enough time for the world to re-form around an absence.

It isn’t enough time for your body to forget what it learned.

The DOJ building looks the same the morning I return—same glass doors, same security turnstiles, same lobby that always smells faintly of burnt coffee and floor polish—but my body reads it differently.

My shoulders don’t rise the way they did before, not quite, but there’s a tightness behind my ribs that wasn’t there the last time I walked in, as if some part of me expects the building to speak.

It doesn’t.

The guard at the desk nods like my entrance is ordinary. The elevator dings. A woman in heels scrolls through her phone as if no one has ever tried to write a suicide note in her voice. I badge in, pass through, keep walking.

I’ve prosecuted enough cases to know that institutions don’t change quickly.

People do.

The corridor to my floor feels narrower than it used to.

Not physically—just in the way a place can feel when it contains too much history.

Too many moments you didn’t consent to carrying.

My office door is exactly where it always was.

The plaque with my name still catches the overhead light at the same angle.

I unlock it.

The first thing I see is my desk, tidy in the way it’s always tidy when I’m trying to control something bigger than paper.

The second is the empty space on the shelf where the Safe Passage binders used to sit—suppressed, removed, boxed, erased with procedural signatures that once felt final.

Now the shelf is waiting.

So am I.

I set my bag down, hang my coat on the hook by the door, and let my fingertips rest for a beat on the edge of the desk, grounding myself in something that doesn’t lie. Wood doesn’t gaslight you. A table doesn’t tell you you’re imagining a lock being picked.

I sit.

Open my laptop.

And the inbox loads like nothing ever happened.

The first email is a calendar update.

The second is a polite reminder about an overdue quarterly training module.

The third is marked URGENT and contains three lines that make the air in the room feel crisp.

SAFE PASSAGE PROJECT — ACTIVE

RETURNED TO THOMPSON

brIEFING 10:00 / CONF ROOM 4B

I stare at it longer than I need to.

Not because I’m surprised.

Because I’m aware, suddenly, of how much I wanted to see it.

Triumph is loud, and my life has taught me to mistrust loud feelings. What I feel instead is something steadier—like the second you step back into a courtroom after a recess and the room is the same, but your posture isn’t.

I print the agenda.

I pull a yellow legal pad toward me.

And then I open the drawer that used to hold the suppressed version of the Morozova case.

It’s empty.

A clean absence.

I don’t know what I expected—an echo, maybe, the ghost of the file that lived there, the one I could never quite let myself stop thinking about—but it’s just an ordinary drawer and an ordinary morning, and I have to remind myself that this is what accountability looks like in real life.

Not dramatic.

Just procedural.

Just stubborn.

Before I stand, my phone lights up with a notification I don’t tap. A message thread with Gabe sits at the top—last night’s short exchange, his Copy still there like a marker on the map.

The NSA interview is gone now—canceled and erased from his future with a quiet finality he never asked me to bless.

Details weren’t offered, but we can speculate.

I told him I wouldn’t be the reason he lost his future—he believes I wasn’t.

Whether he’s right, or wrong, he risked an NSA career anyway, on his own terms.

I don’t know yet how to hold that.

Gratitude sits too close to guilt. Relief feels too much like a claim.

So I set the phone facedown and choose the only thing that has ever steadied me.

Work.

At 9:52, I stand.

In the hall, voices drift from conference rooms, the muted cadence of people discussing policy and budgets and headlines. I pass Harridan’s office on the way to 4B without intending to.

The door is open.

The nameplate is gone.

The space inside is stripped down to its neutral bones—desk cleared, shelves emptied, blinds half raised like someone wanted to make it look bright for the next person.

There’s no trace of him except the faint outline on the carpet where a small coffee table once sat—one I presume was his personal possession.

For a second, my mind tries to put him in the room anyway. Tries to fill the absence the way it always does when something is unresolved.

Then I keep walking.

Because that, too, is part of this.

He’s not here.

And I am.

Conference Room 4B is packed in the way that signals a case has grown teeth.

Two people from Public Integrity. A liaison from DHS oversight—new face, careful muted expression. A line attorney from the trafficking task force that I don’t recognize. A second chair at the table that will belong to me.

Delgado is there, coffee in hand, posture relaxed in the way only competent people can afford.

Rebecca Hanford stands at the front, tablet in her hands, hair pulled back more tightly than usual.

She looks up when I enter.

It’s subtle—just a shift of attention—but the room changes anyway, as if my presence confirms something they’ve been circling without saying out loud.

“Thompson,” Hanford says.

She’s not warm. Nor is she cold. She’s professional.

I take the seat that’s been held.

No one claps or cheers.

Thank god.

Hanford taps the tablet, and the screen on the wall flickers to life with a flowchart that looks like any other bureaucratic slide until you actually read what it says.

HARRIDAN COOPERATION AGREEMENT — PRELIMINARY

DHS SIGNATURE OVERLAP

PAC CHAIR INVESTIGATION — OPEN

SAFE PASSAGE PROJECT — REACTIVATED

After a moment, Quinn’s face replaces the slide—the feed slightly pixelated, resolving and blurring with each small movement, eyes slightly shadowed like she hasn’t slept much recently.

Her update is clean and technical, numbers and nodes and payment-chain mapping delivered without flourish.

She never says Hudson’s name, but when Hanford references KOAN as the external support liaison and Hudson Stone as point of contact, Quinn’s gaze goes flat for half a second before she looks away from the camera.

It’s quick.

If you aren’t trained to notice micro-shifts in a witness, you’d miss it.

I don’t miss it.

Hanford’s voice is measured. The kind of delivery designed for rooms where accurate information is critical.

“Harridan has agreed to cooperate,” she says. “He is providing communications, payment records, and names.”

There’s a shift at the far end of the table—one of the Public Integrity attorneys making a note, the DHS liaison’s jaw tightening slightly, the quiet sound of someone swallowing an emotion they wish to conceal. He’s worked here a long time. Bonds form. I understand.

Hanford continues. “His cooperation has implicated unauthorized DHS authorization signatures connected to Morozova’s transport.

Whether that eventually leads to charges tied directly to her death is unknown.

That’s partly a question for Swiss authorities, given jurisdiction, and partly a question of what the ongoing investigation uncovers. ”

I keep my face neutral.

“Additionally,” Hanford says, “the PAC chair’s operation is under active federal investigation. That investigation is ongoing. No arrests have been made at this time.”

At this time.

The phrase carries the honest limit of what we’ve achieved.

Power moves slowly when it has money.

The DHS liaison mentions that there has been movement in certain financial networks since Harridan’s cooperation became known. Protective movement. The kind that happens when powerful people start identifying as a defense mechanism.

“Some of the individuals Harridan named have retained counsel,” Hanford adds. “We expect motions. Delay. Attempts to relocate assets. This will not be fast.”

No one in the room argues. No one pretends otherwise. It’s almost a relief, the way reality is spoken plainly now.

One name on the slide catches my attention—not a trafficker, a client, and one I recognize instantly, the kind of name that shows up in business press and charity galas, never anywhere near a courtroom. It won’t be the last time wealth and impunity travel together on this case.

I know the profile regardless of the name attached to it.

Two distinct groups sit at the center of what we’re dismantling.

The traffickers are, in most profiles, transactional.

They approach it as logistics—a means to an end, primarily motivated by greed.

The clients, the ones who pay for the labor or the body or the organ, have a more varied profile.

Some frame it the same way—resource management, cold calculation.

But the harder group to identify and prosecute are the entitled ones: sexually motivated, convinced they operate above accountability, often unable to see the person they’ve paid for as a person at all.

They don’t stop to think about the victim.

They may not register a victim exists. That’s the group the leads from Harridan point toward.

If the prosecutions land, maybe the next one thinks twice.

One case. One precedent. That’s how it starts.

One person may not be able to change the world, but one person starts with the case before them. We make a difference, one case at a time.

Hanford’s gaze shifts to me, briefly.

“Safe Passage is reopened,” she says. “Thompson is assigned as lead counsel.”

And then she turns the conversation to logistics—task force resources, document preservation orders, parallel tracks with the trafficking conspiracy case, the careful division of labor between agencies that have spent years protecting their turf.

I take notes.

Ask one question when it matters.

Answer one when I’m asked.

And through it all, I feel the weight of being here.

Not because this is where I should have been all along.

Because this is where they told me I wasn’t allowed to be.

If ads affect your reading experience, click here to remove ads on this page.